Dethroning gravity as the King of the Universe

abstract-gravityWhen man in the state of world-onlooker undertook to form a dynamic picture of the nature of matter, it was inevitable of all the qualities which belong to existence, scientists were only able to imagine and perceive gravity and electricity.

In the 1700s and 1800s mankind’s consciousness was closely bound up with the force of gravity in the human body.  Because of this focus, we were unable to imagine or perceive forces connected with levity, in our body, opposite to gravity.  

Nature is built on and between polar archetypes.  This means it was inevitable the ‘gravity-run-universe’ of Newton will eventually give way to a model of the universe built on gravity and its opposite.  Which we call “levity” in Man or Matter.  

[The process of de-throning gravity as sole King of the universe has already proceeded far in the topic of the Electric Universe (www.Thunderbolts.info, et al) even tho this mis-labels some etheric phenomena as purely electrical.]

To gravity-bound intellects of the 1700s-800s, the only possible counter-force to gravity was electricity. Here lies the origins of our faulty world model, composed of only gravity and electricity, the pro-gravity side of forces, the ‘gravity team.’

We meet the idea of Creation composed and created only by gravity and electricity in the 1900s model of the atom, composed of what?  A heavy electro-positive nucleus circled by virtually weightless electro-negative electrons.  

[Man or Matter goes on to show while gravity is indeed primary, electricity is only a secondary force, NOT the equal opposite of gravity. ]

Heavily revised from Man or Matter, Chapter XIII Radiant Matter p 282.  

Waking up from the dream of Cartesian-Newtonian science

Waking up from the dream of isolation of Descartes

FYI a really excellent objective essay on Descartes’ relevance to the post-2012 world is here:  http://faculty.frostburg.edu/phil/forum/Descartes.htm

Written by Bruce Dickson, SPQR, Spa Fon, On-Off

At least a few pioneering progressive minds, mostly in the fields of healing and personal coaching, seem poised to “cross the Rubicon” in their thinking about science.

The existing traditional barrier is Cartesian-Newtonian science’s presumption it is the ONLY valid science.

Once an individual remembers and acknowledges, we use THREE orders of science every day, there’s no turning back to the idea of ONE, and only one science, no turning back to the Lord of the Rings fantasy of “one ring to unite them all.”

The dream of Cartesian-Newtonian science was a control fantasy; in a phrase borrowed from Alexis Carroll, the fantasy of one science “to predict and control” all others and everything.

This reminds me of John-Roger’s remark, “Control is the master addiction.”
The dream is a Matrix of predict and control working like a swiss watch, completely under control of the small “s” ego.

As long as “predict and control” works for you, there’s no need to consider three sciences. Why complicate something already decided to be simple?

Who are the individuals embracing three sciences? I speculate every one of them has spiritual aspirations that feel unsupported in the matrix of Cartesian-Newtonian science.

It may be, without spiritual aspiration, no solution is called for, no escape from the Matrix is called for, no need exists to step outside the consensus about Cartesian-Newtonian science.

Shifting your world view from one science to three is indeed like jumping ship,; as if, jumping off a slowly moving train. It’s a risk; no doubt about it, because the support of group-think will no longer be on your side nor you on the side of the majority. You are more on your own.

If some of this seems reminiscent of themes from Philosophy of Freedom, you would be correct. Changing your own beliefs, raising your own frequency.

If I allow myself to be indoctrinated through authority-based and reward-punishment-based systems; then, I become part of the cabling connections of the network of Cartesian-Newtonian thinkers and their media handmaidens.

Three Sciences is indeed a more active-dynamic conceptual stance than one science. Crowning second-order science as the one-and-only this serves primarily commercial-industrial-corporate interests, not the interests of seekers of freedom in a post-2012 world.

Breaking the trance that “predict and control” is the greatest good, going through the cognitive dissonance of not one but three sciences is challenging.

Once on the other side, the fresh insights and enhanced awareness can be deeply liberating, generating internal hope and good cheer. Much less of a control system is needed to maintain and protect a scheme of three sciences because the system is less fragile, more synergistic, flexible and resilient.

Imagination, creative visualization, feeling-ization are the engines of a more organic, sustainable and deep, conceptual matrix.

If our imagination is running the dream-program of “predict and control,” we are living in someone else’s dream.

Only in Cartesian-Newtonian science are we hopeless wanderers in a cold lifeless, clockwork universe.

Evidence each soul continues on after our physical body expires is overwhelming, for those open to the evidence of Life After Life, et al. As souls, we go on. Cartesian-Newtonian science was just one chapter in a longer novel with a peaceful, happy ending.

These wisdoms are part of the wealth of a three-science system, connection with galactic significance. Cartesian-Newtonian science is more likely to connect us with more material things nice-to-own and a view of the individual as isolated and alone in a cold universe.

If you have the choice, why allow someone else’s belief system or dream to restrict your imagination? Three sciences supports personal creativity in a way some healthy religions did long ago, 500 years ago and more.

Three sciences inspires independence. When a critical mass of people agree the endgame of “predict and control” is no longer a good game, nor a sustainable game, anymore, then the awesome synchronous power of the universe begins to paint a new world into being, more fulfilling ways of living and evolving individually and in tribes.

The language of this web page was helpful to the above thinking: http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=11600&page=2

Goethean holistic science analogized to “warp and woof”

warp-woofGoethe’s Science theory and method can be analogized to “warp” and “woof” in weaving. 

Warp and woof point to the two directions of threads in cloth. When woven together, regardless of the raw material, warp and woof together, conjoined, have the best chance of creating whole cloth.

The warp is the the laborious footwork of observing your subject, in Nature as much as possible, from as many angles as possible, in as many seasons as possible.  This is the Outer Game of Goethean Holistic Science.

The woof is taking all your external observations, written notes and explorations inside, into your thoughts and feelings:

  • What observations repeat?
  • What patterns, if any, can you perceive?
  • Have other explorers found these same repeating patterns or not?
  • Is you initial question (hypothesis)  still relevant to your own personal growth direction?
  • Do your observations support tweaking your hypothesis usefully?
  • Going all the way in to Imagination, Intuition and Inspiration, what light, if any, do they add to your subject?

When the Inner Game of GHS is complete, then the explorer returns back to the warp.  Time to report your findings to colleagues, and anyone else interested.  We share our of expansive joy.  We also share to see if others can see our openings to negativity, “chinks in our armor,” in our arguments, better than we can.  

Q:  How does this differ from conventional science?

A:  To understand how a Goethean approach differs, the frame has to expand to include the Three Sciences We Use Everyday.  If new to you, read that then come back here.  

The easy way to discern how a Goethean approach differs from conventional science is to go thru the above again in the framework-paradigm of Three Sciences:

The Outer Game of Goethean Science, the warp applies Second Order Science.  DO the labor of observing your subject, in Nature, as much as possible, from as many angles as possible, in as many seasons as possible. View your subject so completely, any second explorer, any other place on Earth, or in time in the last 100 years or next 100 years, can replicate and verify your observations.

Applying the methods of Second Order Science is the Outer Game of Goethean Science.

Then the woof.  We go inside, to our garret, our cave, our study, our meditations and contemplations.  We assess our observations.  We check our notes.  We recall…

“Being a scientist is simply being careful not to fool yourself” — John Carlson, amateur rocket scientist

We accept and admit to ourself our perceptions are necessarily SUBjective.  There can be error.  Bias, prdjudice and intolerance can all be uncovered and rooted out.  We check and often re-check to remove First Order Science distortions due to imperfect subjective perception. 

That’s not all.  We check ourself to see how we have changed observing our subject.  We also check to discern how observing our subject has changed us.  Maybe in observing birds and wildlife covered in oil from an offshore oil spill we come to a greater appreciation of and dedication to renewable forms of energy.  Noticing how we change in studying our subject is First Order Science.

Third Order Science appears in our moral-ethical conclusions based on our outer exploration and inner cogitations.  Perhaps as was done by some in the 1960s, our outer experiences and inner contemplations causes a few of us to conclude the military draft of young men forcing them to be footsoldiers in wars is unethical, cannot be supported and actions against this form of mind control are beneficial to the majority of people.  Perhaps we are so convicted of this view, a few of us collect bottles of cow’s blood, break into an Army recruiting office at night, and pour blood on all the files and documents we can find.  

This is how applying Goethean Science can lead to acts of civil disobedience.  Thoreau at least would applaud.  

Guess what?  The “powers that be” including virtually all corporations, understand this possible outcome of applying science in its holistic form (Goethean).  They don’t want this.  

How to control science to it remains the handmaiden of corporate interests?  You pay your scientists.  You pay them in part to make an unspoken bargain for them to keep their subjective (First Order Science) and moral-etheric considerations (Third Order Science) off the table, out of sight and out of mind.  

In this way, since about 1940 or 1950, science restricts itself more and more to uncovering only what the “powers that be” including virtually all corporations, wish to have uncovered and discovered; that is, more things to make them profitable.  

The above suggests why Goethean holistic science is potentially dangerous to the current status quo of elites; and, why science must be controlled as it currently is in early 2018. 

Written by Bruce Dickson, HolisticBrainBalance.wordpress.com